MadFanboy Forum

Wander писал(а):

Но сейчас, когда есть игры намного лучше

http://www.metacritic.com/game/nintendo ... na-of-time

Вот как с таким разговаривать по-человечески?

TheTinkino писал(а):

Wander писал(а):

Но сейчас, когда есть игры намного лучше

http://www.metacritic.com/game/nintendo ... na-of-time

Мариобои получили треш на 99 баллов

Есть объективные игроки

metacritic

Dimok-chan писал(а):

TheTinkino писал(а):

Wander писал(а):

Но сейчас, когда есть игры намного лучше

http://www.metacritic.com/game/nintendo ... na-of-time

Мариобои получили треш на 99 баллов

Есть объективные игроки, которые ставят реальные оценки(4-6) , а есть фанатики. Которые даже в игру не играя ставят 10.
У мариопсихов 99% таких.

Есть объективные игроки, которые ставят реальные оценки(4-6) , а есть фанатики. Которые даже в игру не играя ставят 10

Если зельда такое говно почему многие не последние люди в индустрии говорят, что это одна из их любимейших серий игр

Wander писал(а):

Есть объективные игроки

metacritic

Ты реально тугой

Факты друг мой Иначе попахивает Слив Медалью

It is an amazing game... However it is the same game as 4 of its predecessors and was followed by one of the best and most original games in the series since Link to the past. Ocarina of time did the same thing as link to the past but cut out substance for graphics. Fewer items, fewer side quests, fewer dungeons, fewer secrets, less varied world and less manipulating the game for speed runs (without the hacks) and had most of the same bad guys. It was than followed by Majora's mask which was original with a new story, a new villain, new items and some of the most exciting side quests I've seen. Not to mention the fierce Deities mask which was and is my favorite item in the series thus far.

I don't see why everyone rates this game so well. I'm a fan of nintendo games and loved the glory days of N64, but this game is truly not the best Legend of Zelda game and not even close to the best N64 game. The beginning level in the forest is completely bland and repetitive as you are looking for enough money for a sword and shield. That is totally not the best intro to any game. It's hard to hate on a game that got so much glory, but it deserves it in my opinion. It, in no way, was perfect by any standard, because it's impossible to make a perfect game. I say, if they remade it and updated it, it would achieve full greatness, but that's one thing Nintendo is bad at, is making remakes(golden eye, Rygar, Metroid). Verdict: Good for it's time? Hell yeah. Good for now? No way. Best game ever? No. The best game should be on a factor of fun and content, and while content can be measured, fun cannot. Collapse

Если зельда такое говно почему многие не последние люди в индустрии говорят, что это одна из их любимейших серий игр

Dimok-chan писал(а):

Wander писал(а):

Есть объективные игроки

metacritic

Ты реально тугой

Да, там есть юзерскор.
See all 404 User Reviews

Факты друг мой Иначе попахивает Слив Медалью

поставил 6

It is an amazing game... However it is the same game as 4 of its predecessors and was followed by one of the best and most original games in the series since Link to the past. Ocarina of time did the same thing as link to the past but cut out substance for graphics. Fewer items, fewer side quests, fewer dungeons, fewer secrets, less varied world and less manipulating the game for speed runs (without the hacks) and had most of the same bad guys. It was than followed by Majora's mask which was original with a new story, a new villain, new items and some of the most exciting side quests I've seen. Not to mention the fierce Deities mask which was and is my favorite item in the series thus far.

поставил 4

I don't see why everyone rates this game so well. I'm a fan of nintendo games and loved the glory days of N64, but this game is truly not the best Legend of Zelda game and not even close to the best N64 game. The beginning level in the forest is completely bland and repetitive as you are looking for enough money for a sword and shield. That is totally not the best intro to any game. It's hard to hate on a game that got so much glory, but it deserves it in my opinion. It, in no way, was perfect by any standard, because it's impossible to make a perfect game. I say, if they remade it and updated it, it would achieve full greatness, but that's one thing Nintendo is bad at, is making remakes(golden eye, Rygar, Metroid). Verdict: Good for it's time? Hell yeah. Good for now? No way. Best game ever? No. The best game should be on a factor of fun and content, and while content can be measured, fun cannot. Collapse

Если зельда такое говно почему многие не последние люди в индустрии говорят, что это одна из их любимейших серий игр

Трешоделы наверное.

Да, там есть юзерскор.

It really pains me to write this as Uncharted 2 was one of my favourite games of all time but Uncharted 3 is not even close to its equal. Even the original Uncharted happens to be more fun as I had been playing it the week before to prepare for this. To summarise, nothing in Uncharted 3 is done better than any of the previous game except for the graphics for obvious reasons but graphics do not maketh the game. Possibly the multiplayer too but I don't really care about that. Uncharted for me has always been about cinematic single player. Without having spoilers, the story is worse than both previous Uncharted games as many plot threads remain unresolved and the game ends on one of the biggest anti-climaxes I have ever seen in a game. The main villain managed to be even more boring than Lazarovic which I kinda thought amazing because he was pretty generic. The pacing is worse than both games and it will take nearly a couple of hours before you even get to shoot anything which in a 6.5 hour game (yes, shorter than both previous games) is pretty awful. The shooting appears to have changed for the worse being incredibly laggy and making long distance combat nearly impossible. It's quite nasty having to shoot the armoured guys walking towards you when you have to get numerous headshots to take down one of them and the game won't let you aim properly. Speaking of, the game continuously likes to spam these guys at you as well as guys with sniper rifles or rocket launchers where they were few and far between in the original games to get you to change your strategy a little. The change means that often you deaths are the result of having 3 guys firing rocket launchers right at you the moment you poke your head around a corner. Melee combat takes far too long to beat people and the game seems to be reluctant to let you get out of melee mode with the result that you quickly get shot dead because you couldn't run away. It should be mentioned however that the visuals are excellent and the music is very good at getting your heart racing when doing a cinematic move. Overall I was extremely disappointed with Uncharted 3. My experience was mostly made of cheap deaths and a story that failed to soften the blow. I would have returned it but because of the online pass I wouldn't have been able to get all my money back. Seeing as how the majority of people like it, it may be enjoyed by you but there's the risk you may be disappointed like I was. Buy with caution.

FanboyHater писал(а):

Uncharted 3
Чувак поставил 4

It really pains me to write this as Uncharted 2 was one of my favourite games of all time but Uncharted 3 is not even close to its equal. Even the original Uncharted happens to be more fun as I had been playing it the week before to prepare for this. To summarise, nothing in Uncharted 3 is done better than any of the previous game except for the graphics for obvious reasons but graphics do not maketh the game. Possibly the multiplayer too but I don't really care about that. Uncharted for me has always been about cinematic single player. Without having spoilers, the story is worse than both previous Uncharted games as many plot threads remain unresolved and the game ends on one of the biggest anti-climaxes I have ever seen in a game. The main villain managed to be even more boring than Lazarovic which I kinda thought amazing because he was pretty generic. The pacing is worse than both games and it will take nearly a couple of hours before you even get to shoot anything which in a 6.5 hour game (yes, shorter than both previous games) is pretty awful. The shooting appears to have changed for the worse being incredibly laggy and making long distance combat nearly impossible. It's quite nasty having to shoot the armoured guys walking towards you when you have to get numerous headshots to take down one of them and the game won't let you aim properly. Speaking of, the game continuously likes to spam these guys at you as well as guys with sniper rifles or rocket launchers where they were few and far between in the original games to get you to change your strategy a little. The change means that often you deaths are the result of having 3 guys firing rocket launchers right at you the moment you poke your head around a corner. Melee combat takes far too long to beat people and the game seems to be reluctant to let you get out of melee mode with the result that you quickly get shot dead because you couldn't run away. It should be mentioned however that the visuals are excellent and the music is very good at getting your heart racing when doing a cinematic move. Overall I was extremely disappointed with Uncharted 3. My experience was mostly made of cheap deaths and a story that failed to soften the blow. I would have returned it but because of the online pass I wouldn't have been able to get all my money back. Seeing as how the majority of people like it, it may be enjoyed by you but there's the risk you may be disappointed like I was. Buy with caution.

TheTinkino писал(а):

Dimok-chan, Согласен, что Анч 3 4 из 10?

Согласен что зельда окарина на 4 из 10.